He was banned.
An interesting point about that:
Not too long ago, in the Court's heyday, quite a few people accused us of "tyrannical" actions and/or schemes. The argument behind said accusations often took the following form: "If you do X to Y without consulting Y first, you act tyrannically. Hence, you are a tyrant. Waaah!"
The interesting point here is that I have yet to see any one of these critics condemn Dragoon for acting tyrannically toward us. After all, he took it upon himself to ban me without consultation or pretext, to sabotage my accounts (including a paying account, the legality of which I am too kind to call into doubt), and to unilaterally block further actions on my part. You would think that some of these liberty-loving players would be up in arms over this blatant tyranny... Not so.
I suppose this just goes to show that hypocrisy is alive and well in the Western world...